|
DATA CENTER MOVES
|
CHANNEL EXTENSION APPLICATIONS
|
Most major computing facilities were originally placed
in a headquarters
location to serve the large population of users there and to insure the
best possible service to this important client base. The factors that
influenced
site location in the past are no longer valid.
The MIS department of today needs facilities that are
specifically designed
to serve their unique requirements. Traditional sites in high density
developments
such as downtown are now too expensive and inaccessible to be utilized
effectively as data centers. Add to this, the ever present need for
enhanced
security and the only viable answer might be a move. A new site not
only
presents the opportunity to address these problems, but also opens the
way to seek preferential tax rates, more dependable power sources and a
suburban setting to help attract and retain qualified professional
staff
members.
Communications facilities to support large user groups
remotely are
steadily increasing in speed, reliability and availability while
decreasing
in cost. One fact remains unchanged. There will be requirements at the
remote sites that can only be satisfied by channel attached devices.
Most
high speed peripherals are engineered with a channel interface to
ensure
that their rated capacities are obtained.
The PIXNET-XL family of products was designed to support
channel attached
devices that are geographically remote, just as though the equipment
was
channel attached to the CPU. Utilizing the most efficient
communications
techniques in the industry today, PIXNET-XL products can deliver
sub-second
response to interactive users and operate unit record equipment at
rated
speeds with no distance limitation. These devices include laser
printers,
check processing systems, microfiche printers, magnetic tape subsystems
and others. You can optimize communication facilities to ensure low
costs
and high productivity over a wide variety of communications media. The
service level provided to local users can now be extended to any
location
that has the requirement without incurring the cost and support issues
that accompany a remote mainframe operation (see diagram which
follows):
| |
 |
 |
| |
Before Data
Center Move |
After Data
Center Move |
Back to top
|